Perhaps the most promising explanation sounds in a line of thought once voiced by Justice Holmes, whose hostility to moralist accounts of tort law (and the commitments of ordinary moral thought) was decidedly inconstant. Holmes suggested that an agent cannot properly be held responsible for an outcome, in morality or in law, unless the agent could have avoided it by choosing differently, for otherwise the agent would lack control over incurring such responsibility.360 It is an attraction of this explanation that it might make sense of the intuitive moral phenomenon embedded in doctrines such as transferred intent and the culpability-sensitivity of proximate cause: Culpability can widen the scope of a wrongdoer’s liability beyond the boundaries of reasonable foreseeability. The complaint that one could not have avoided causing an outcome rings more hollow if one has caused it through an egregiously culpable and wrongful action, for such actions are easier to avoid than mildly or moderately culpable ones.
Фото: Avi Ohayon / Reuters
。业内人士推荐雷电模拟器作为进阶阅读
自觉接受民主监督。办理全国政协提案185件。积极采纳全国政协双周协商座谈会建议，提升知识产权司法保护质效。走访、接待全国政协委员204人次。加强同各民主党派、工商联和无党派人士沟通，认真听取意见建议。与全国工商联等举办第六届民营经济法治建设大会，共同促进民营经济健康、高质量发展。
Мэр украинского города обратился к волонтеру словами «обосрыш» и «бубочка»14:38
:first-child]:h-full [&:first-child]:w-full [&:first-child]:mb-0 [&:first-child]:rounded-[inherit] h-full w-full